Steven King, yes, Mr. Horror himself , editor of The Best American Short Stories 2007, and a damn fine writer, has this to say in the Sunday New York Times about the state of the short story .

Instead, let us consider what the bottom shelf does to writers who still care, sometimes passionately, about the short story. What happens when he or she realizes that his or her audience is shrinking almost daily? Well, if the writer is worth his or her salt, he or she continues on nevertheless, because it’s what God or genetics (possibly they are the same) has decreed, or out of sheer stubbornness, or maybe because it’s such a kick to spin tales. Possibly a combination. And all that’s good.

What’s not so good is that writers write for whatever audience is left. In too many cases, that audience happens to consist of other writers and would-be writers who are reading the various literary magazines (and The New Yorker, of course, the holy grail of the young fiction writer) not to be entertained but to get an idea of what sells there. And this kind of reading isn’t real reading, the kind where you just can’t wait to find out what happens next (think “Youth,” by Joseph Conrad, or “Big Blonde,” by Dorothy Parker). It’s more like copping-a-feel reading. There’s something yucky about it.

 Read the full article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/books/review/King2-t.html?_r=1&em&ex=1191297600&en=31912528dacbd8bc&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin

Thanks to Debra Murphy and the Idyllst blog for alerting me to this one!